
A single dashboard of every regulatory obligation across every entity you control — scored by severity, sorted by due date, recalculating in real time as you fix things.
Model the legal record first — entities, officers, members, dates.
Turn every task into one workflow with documents and signatures attached.
Let Flo draft from the live record, never from a blank page.
Lodge with the regulator from inside the action, not a separate portal.
Continuously scan for stale records, missing items and overdue obligations.
Compliance management software gives you a single dashboard of every regulatory obligation across every entity — annual reviews, BAS, tax, insurance renewals, licences, beneficial ownership, AML — scored by severity and sorted by due date. EntityFlo runs an 8-category detect-only engine that recalculates the score the moment something is fixed.
Each category has a defined severity model. A critical issue deducts 25 points; a warning, 10; a low, 3. Critical caps an entity below Healthy regardless of score.
A checklist tells you what is missing. A score tells you what matters. EntityFlo is built around the second answer.
We find issues and point at the remedy. We never silently file forms or change registers on your behalf.
One critical issue (missing consent, overdue annual review) caps the entity below Healthy even if everything else is clean.
Every issue links to the exact remediation — a missing consent opens the consent generator, an overdue 484 opens the lodgement flow.
The dashboard shows group score, per-category drilldown, and per-entity ranking. Filterable by jurisdiction or owner.
Generic GRC platforms cost more than the compliance team they replace. Checklists do not score. EntityFlo sits in the middle — purpose-built for corporate compliance.
If any of these are missing, the platform will become a second job.
Does it score by severity, or just produce a list of red ticks?
Is each issue linked to a specific fix workflow?
Does the score recalculate the moment you resolve something?
Can issues be marked Not Applicable with a recorded reason?
Does the audit trail capture every change?
Does it cover AML/CTF for reporting entities?
Group score is 84. Two entities are below 60. You triage the criticals first.
Missing Director IDs queued. Consent forms generated and sent to e-sign in one batch.
PI insurance expiring on three entities. Renewals logged, new expiry dates set.
Export the group compliance summary as a PDF for the audit committee.
No per-document fees. No per-filing fees. No paywalled AI tier. The first entity is free, forever.
Each category starts at 100. Issues deduct points by severity (Critical -25, Warning -10, Low -3). Category scores average into an entity score. Any Critical caps the entity below Healthy.
Yes. Each issue can be marked Not Applicable with a written reason; the audit trail preserves it.
Yes. AUSTRAC obligations for reporting entities are tracked under a dedicated AML program module.
Continuously. Compliance recalculates whenever underlying data changes.
Yes. Per-entity permissions support scoped access.
Every change is logged. The audit trail exports as a PDF bundle per entity or per period.
Free for one entity. From $199/mo for a 25-entity group, including AI drafting and ASIC lodgement.
We use cookies to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always active. You can accept all cookies or choose essential only.